The Organic Infinite Positive Feedback Circuit Loop, Version 14
Nerdvana
JJJJJJJJ. Infinity (Positive only) with Infinite Math
Infinite returns with Equation with Positivism in 5 months
Mathematicians Measure Infinites
Infinity comes in more than one size. Might there be some sizes we don’t yet know about? The question is one of the biggest in mathematics. A surprising recent proof shows that two different infinite sets, long thought to have different sizes, are actually the same.
https://www.quantamagazine.org/mathematicians-measure-infinities-find-theyre-equal-20170912/?utm_content=buffer4e481&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=buffer
“If it’s true that everything can be divided to infinity, then infinity is within you.” – Nassim Haramein
Infinite
http://bigthink.com/ideafeed/an-infinite-god-is-more-mathematician-than-theologian?utm_campaign=Echobox&utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Facebook#link_time=1494343774
Abstract syncs with Quantum Mechanics and returns with Positivism
Each department of knowledge passes through three stages. The theoretic stage; the theological stage and the metaphysical or abstract stage – Auguste Comte
Positivism is a philosophical theory stating that positive[clarification needed] knowledge is based on natural phenomena and their properties and relations. Thus, information derived from sensory experience, interpreted through reason and logic, forms the exclusive source of all authoritative[clarification needed] knowledge.[1] Positivism holds that valid knowledge (certitude or truth) is found only in this derived knowledge[clarification needed].[2]
Abstract, Quantum Mechanics, Wave Mechanics, Tesla
https://quantummicromechanics.wordpress.com/2015/02/03/soul-body-vibration-by-mohsen-paul-sarfarazi-ph-d/?preview=true&preview_id=311&preview_nonce=b5773d242d&iframe=true
Physicists/Mathematicians/Scientists/Metaphysicians on God returns in 4 days with Pantheism, Heisenberg, Campbell, Nin, Einstein, and Harmony (Pythagorean Harmonics)
Faith
http://bigthink.com/videos/neil-degrasse-tyson-on-science-and-faith?utm_campaign=Echobox&utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Facebook#link_time=1490887894
Einstein with God as Energy, Mathematician and Physicist
Some (including the scientist himself) have called Einstein’s spiritual views as pantheism, largely influenced by the philosophy of Baruch Spinoza. Pantheists see God as existing but abstract, equating all of reality with divinity. They also reject a specific personal God or a god that is somehow endowed with human attributes.
Himself a famous atheist, Richard Dawkins calls Einstein’s pantheism a “sexed-up atheism,” but other scholars point to the fact that Einstein did seem to believe in a supernatural intelligence that’s beyond the physical world. He referred to it in his writings as “a superior spirit,” “a superior mind” and a “spirit vastly superior to men”.
http://bigthink.com/paul-ratner/albert-einsteins-surprising-thoughts-on-the-meaning-of-life?utm_campaign=Echobox&utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Facebook#link_time=1489413842
Is Physics the next guru?
https://www.deepakchopra.com/blog/article/5185
Where did Mathematics come from?
http://www.kcet.org/shows/deepak_chopra_the_future_of_god/deepak-chopra-the-future-of-god.html
Is God a Mathematician?
http://www.inspireactachieve.com/consciousness/respected-scientist-claims-he-has-found-definitive-proof-that-god-exists/
“The mathematician’s patterns, like the painter’s or the poet’s, must be beautiful; the ideas, like the colours or the words, must fit together in a harmonious way. Beauty is the first test: there is no permanent place in the world for ugly mathematics.”
– G. H. Hardy
“Mathematics is the language with which God has written the universe”
~ Galileo Galilei
Miracle #22128
“Happiness is neither without us nor within us. It is in God, both without us and within us.” — Blaise Pascal Thank you!
“I believe in God, only I spell it Nature.”
~ Frank Lloyd Wright
Einstein was comfortable with fluid boundaries, as one sees in a famous quote of his: “I want to know how God created this world. I am not interested in this or that phenomenon, in the spectrum of this or that element. I want to know His thoughts; the rest are details.” https://www.deepakchopra.com/blog/article/5287
Miracle #10334
“In the absence of any other proof, the thumb alone would convince me of God’s existence.” — Sir Isaac Newton Thank you!
Miracle #2548
“Know thyself, and thou shalt know the universe and God.” — Pythagoras Thank you!
Miracle #7800
Every sentence I utter must be understood not as an affirmation, but as a question. — Niels Bohr Thank you!
The Man Who Knew Infinity
On Channeling
Ramanujan: You wanted to know how I get my ideas.
Mmm.
My God.
Namagiri.
She speaks to me.
Puts formulas on my tongue when I sleep,
sometimes when I pray.
Do you believe me?
Because if you are my friend, then you
will know that I’m telling you the truth.
If you are truly my friend.
Hardy
But I don’t believe in God.
I don’t believe in anything I can’t prove.
Then you can’t believe in me.
Ramanujan
Don’t you see?
An equation has no meaning to me
unless it expresses a thought of God.
On Miracles
LITTLEWOOD: My dear Harold,
please forgive
this personal transgression.
I’m gone now to this god-awful war
and haven’t the faintest idea
if I will ever return.
Fortunately, unlike you,
I do have God to take comfort in.
I have two points to make.
The first is
that Ramanujan’s work on primes,
while brilliant in itself, is actually wrong.
The other point is less straightforward.
You have in Ramanujan
nothing short of a miracle.
The man exceeds any notion of brilliance
that I have ever understood.
Forget Jacobi,
we can compare him with Newton.
I have come to believe
that for Ramanujan,
every single positive integer
is one of his personal friends.
On Breakthroughs
So, now we see the work on partitions
and the enormous
breakthrough that has been achieved.
All this, mind you,
by a man whose limitations
of knowledge when I met him
were as startling as was its profundity.
Opinions may differ as to the
importance of Ramanujan’s work
and the influence it may or may not
have on the mathematics of the future,
but one gift it does show
is its profound and invincible originality.
Mr. Littlewood once told me
that “every positive integer is one
of Ramanujan’s personal friends.”
I believe this to be true.
He told me that
an equation for him had no meaning
unless it expressed a thought of God.
Well, despite everything in my
being set to the contrary,
perhaps he is right.
For is this not exactly our
justification for pure mathematics?
We are merely explorers of infinity
in the pursuit of absolute perfection.
We do not invent
these formulae, they already exist
and lie in wait for only the very
brightest of minds, like Ramanujan,
ever to divine and prove.
So, in the end,
I have been forced to consider,
who are we to question Ramanujan,
let alone God?
“I think he has the finest mind I’ve seen in my lifetime.”
Bertrand Russell: “You should let him run.”
Srinivasa Ramanujan: What do you see?
Janaki: Sand.
[he picks up a handful of sand]
Srinivasa Ramanujan: Imagine if we could look so closely we could see each grain, each particle. You see there are patterns in everything.
Today, you are being invited to look at the infinite picture. In comparison to the joy, happiness and love you experience, the negative is just a minuscule piece. The Universe is giving you the opportunity to see the entire puzzle and how everything fits into it. And, once you see it, there is no going back. (Smiling) Are you ready and willing to allow? ~ Creator
https://thecreatorwritings.wordpress.com/2019/09/15/the-infinite-picture/
